ClearAML
Hosted software intended to carry the obligation lifecycle end to end.
Checked 8 October 2026
Provider’s own site (opens in a new tab)From
$53.90
inc GST, per month
$49.00 as published, ex GST
SMR export
AUSTRAC XML
Screening
Ongoing
Audit log
Not established
Capability coverage
16/31
verified. 8 not established.
Marketed to
- Accounting
- Real estate
- Legal
- Conveyancing
Data stored in
Australia
Data processed in
Australia and overseas
Privacy policy states identity verification and screening run in the EU and US, AI drafting, payments and error monitoring in the US, and email in the US and Japan; the verification provider is not named (sub-processor list on request).
Pricing detail Solo $49/mo +GST (2 users). Starter $149/mo +GST (10 users). Professional $299/mo +GST (25 users, $135/mo credit). Enterprise contact sales. Per check: KYC $8.00, KYB $5 + variable, company extract $25.00, related-party screening $1.00, standalone screening $5.00, AI map extraction $3 beyond allowance. 14-day free trial plus $15 signup credit.
Where it is stronger
Capabilities verified here that fewer than half of the other products are verified on. Worked out from the board, not written by hand.
- Independent evaluation support (s84)2 of 16 others
- AUSTRAC SMR XML export3 of 16 others
- Document Verification Service access4 of 16 others
- Versioned AML program and CDD records4 of 16 others
- Threshold transaction reporting5 of 16 others
- Suspicious matter report workflow7 of 16 others
- Evidence pack export7 of 16 others
Where it is weaker
Recorded with the same care as the capabilities, and not softened. A comparison that only lists strengths is not a comparison.
- Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Risk assessed per designated service.Vendor states every client is scored on four dimensions, one of which is the risk of the designated service being provided; the product docs describe profession-specific questionnaires per service line, and no separate risk rating per designated service is described.
- Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk.Product docs set client review cycles by risk rating (Low 36, Medium 24, High 12 months) and marketing claims automatic re-assessment triggers on material changes; a re-review triggered by a new designated service is not described.
- Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Program obligations calendar (reviews, effectiveness, AMLCO reports, independent evaluation).Product docs track the AML/CTF program review date (auto-added on publish, emailed 30 days before and when overdue), let officers add custom calendar events, remind about the 14-day AUSTRAC compliance-officer notification and include an Annual Compliance Report assistant; risk assessment review, governing-body reporting and independent evaluation dates are not tracked automatically.
- Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recorded.Product docs offer an Escalate decision on screening matches and automatic EDD escalation for high-risk assessments, but do not describe how an escalation is routed to the compliance officer or how its outcome is notified back.
- Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Expired document alerts.Vendor homepage states the dashboard shows document expiry dates; no alert for expired documents or active engagements is described in the docs.
- Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Reliance CDD requests sent and received.Vendor changelog describes Inter-Firm Connections that send a complete client compliance record to a connected firm; the vendor does not describe this as a reliance arrangement, and no inbound request workflow is described.
- Verification charged per check on all tiers; only Professional and above include a monthly credit.
Capabilities
All 31 fields we track, shown whether or not we could establish them.
Reading a spec strip
- Verifiedconfirmed on the provider’s own site
- Partialpresent but limited or conditional
- Absentthe product does not do it
- Not establishedwe could not confirm either way
Each bar runs one segment per capability, in the same order on every board, so two providers compare by position. A hatched segment means the field is unfilled, not that the product lacks the capability — around half of all capability fields on this site are currently unestablished, and a blank would read as “no” and misrepresent a real business. Show all opens the full list in place.
Program
- AML/CTF program buildNot established
- Risk assessmentYes
- Program maintenance and reviewNot established
- Independent evaluation support (s84)Yes
Stated as audit exports "ready for routine reviews, independent evaluations, or unannounced inspections" — support for an evaluation, not the evaluation itself.
- Staff trainingYes
Customer
- Customer due diligenceYes
- Know your business (entity checks)Yes
- Beneficial ownership and controlYes
- Enhanced due diligenceNot established
- Reliance arrangementsNot established
Identity
- Electronic identity verificationYes
- Biometric liveness and face matchYes
- Document Verification Service accessYes
Marketing states identity verification runs through the DVS; the terms of service describe it as reached "via an authorised gateway", meaning access is through a provider rather than direct.
Screening
- PEP and sanctions screeningYes
- Adverse media screeningNot established
- Ongoing customer monitoringYes
- Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules)Partial
Product docs describe transactions logged manually (or per client) and auto-flagged against two configurable thresholds (cash default $10,000, any transaction default $50,000); pattern-based rules are not described.
Tranche 2 operations
- Risk assessed per designated servicePartial
Vendor states every client is scored on four dimensions, one of which is the risk of the designated service being provided; the product docs describe profession-specific questionnaires per service line, and no separate risk rating per designated service is described.
- Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and riskPartial
Product docs set client review cycles by risk rating (Low 36, Medium 24, High 12 months) and marketing claims automatic re-assessment triggers on material changes; a re-review triggered by a new designated service is not described.
- Program obligations calendar (reviews, effectiveness, AMLCO reports, independent evaluation)Partial
Product docs track the AML/CTF program review date (auto-added on publish, emailed 30 days before and when overdue), let officers add custom calendar events, remind about the 14-day AUSTRAC compliance-officer notification and include an Annual Compliance Report assistant; risk assessment review, governing-body reporting and independent evaluation dates are not tracked automatically.
- Versioned AML program and CDD recordsYes
Product docs state every published program version is kept (superseded versions move to a Decommissioned tab, retained 7 years), and each client's risk assessments are kept as a dated history with past assessments preserving the questions they were scored with.
- Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recordedPartial
Product docs offer an Escalate decision on screening matches and automatic EDD escalation for high-risk assessments, but do not describe how an escalation is routed to the compliance officer or how its outcome is notified back.
- Expired document alertsPartial
Vendor homepage states the dashboard shows document expiry dates; no alert for expired documents or active engagements is described in the docs.
- Reliance CDD requests sent and receivedPartial
Vendor changelog describes Inter-Firm Connections that send a complete client compliance record to a connected firm; the vendor does not describe this as a reliance arrangement, and no inbound request workflow is described.
Reporting
- Suspicious matter report workflowYes
- AUSTRAC SMR XML exportYes
Product docs state SMR, TTR, IFTI and CBM reports are exported as a batch XML ZIP for upload through AUSTRAC Online (requires the AUSTRAC Enrolment ID); no schema version is stated.
- Tipping-off controls (s123)Not established
- Threshold transaction reportingYes
Record
- Evidence pack exportYes
- Immutable audit logNot established
- API accessNot established
Integrations
None named on the provider’s own site. For a firm that wants AML to run inside its existing practice or property software, that is worth establishing directly before you buy.
Registered entity
On the Australian Business Register
- Legal entity
- BRIVE PTY LTD
- ABN
- 14 680 839 329Verify on the ABR (opens in a new tab)
- Registered from
- 20 September 2024
- Other business names
- clear aml
Recorded, not scored
Where this came from
- Pricing page (opens in a new tab)Checked 25 August 2026
- ABR record (opens in a new tab)Checked 25 August 2026
- Staff training page (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Audit trail page (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- FAQ hub (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- About page (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Tranche 2 guide (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Terms of service (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- Privacy policy (opens in a new tab)Checked 26 August 2026
- AML risk assessment software page (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: Risk assessments (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: AML/CTF program (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: PEP and sanctions screening (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Homepage (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Product updates (May 2026) (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: Transaction monitoring (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Docs: AUSTRAC reporting (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
- Security and data page (opens in a new tab)Checked 8 October 2026
Australian AML/CTF platform with the lowest published entry price in the subscription segment and the most granular per-check pricing observed. Operated by Brive Pty Ltd, registered September 2024.
One of only two vendors researched that offers a free trial.
Capability coverage beyond the fields above was not established and is left absent rather than inferred.
Compared with
Side-by-side against the products this one is most often weighed up against. Each comparison states first whether the two are even the same kind of thing.
- ClearAML vs StackGo IdentityCheckAn end-to-end platform against a verification layer that plugs into your existing CRM. Different jobs, and StackGo prices in USD.
- duely vs ClearAMLBoth cover accounting, real estate, legal and conveyancing — a like-for-like read on capability depth across the same verticals.
- ClearAML vs ComplyReadySame four verticals, same product type — a clean test of which platform actually covers more of the obligation lifecycle.
- easyAML vs ClearAMLeasyAML markets to a narrower set of verticals than ClearAML — worth checking whether that narrower scope means deeper coverage.
Is this your product?
You can correct a factual error, supply evidence for a field marked not established, or add detail. A limitation is corrected when it is wrong, and stays when it is accurate but unwelcome.
Claim this listingEditor’s picks in AML/CTF software
In AML/CTF software
Not opinions. Each pick is the record that leads on one stated measure within this category, with the figure shown so you can check it against the board.
Most capabilities verified
29
of the 31 fields tracked
duely
17 records measured PlatformMost Tranche 2 operations measures met
7
of the 7 Tranche 2 measures
duely
17 records measured PlatformLowest published entry price
Free
normalised to GST-inclusive AUD
SimpleAML
13 records measured RegisterWidest sector coverage
6
Tranche 2 sectors marketed to
Syntrico
17 records measured PlatformLongest-established entity
2007
ABN active on the register since
NameScan
14 records measured Verification